The problem with the same party being in power and having a majority in congress, is the perceived and actual favoritism of the oversight responsibility. An interesting article by Dana Milbank in today's Washington Post entitled "Bush's fumbles spur new talk of oversight on Hill" gives a good description of the problem. Apparently it seems nothing was too small to investigate under the Clinton administration, and nothing is too big to ignore under the Bush's presidency. We are talking 1052 subpeonas to prove misconduct under the Clinton administration during the period 1997-2002 at a cost of 35 million dollars, compared to 3 under the Bush's administration. The legislative branch has abandoned most of its oversight responsibilities because of agressive actions by this administration and acquience by congressional leaders. The House ethics committe really needs to be reformed: it has not opened a new case in the past 12 months ! If bipartisan oversight cannot be achieved in order to reform the House, then there should be some mechanism for independent enquiry and oversight.
An effective way you do not on account of who you are, although attributable to who else I am certain after feel against you. [url=http://Niketnpascher001.fr/]tn pas cher[/url] tn pas cher
Posted by: tn pas cher | May 06, 2013 at 07:42 PM